Initially the status was "awaiting Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. " Does it mean that my paper will go through Answer: Each journal has its own status descriptions, and the meaning for a certain status can change from journal to journal. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. Decision after review and revision. Following I have a paper on a Springer journal with "Accept - from one reviewer and Accept with minor revision with1-2 little modifications form another After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. At this You may go through them here. You may also find a similar I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. The authors can still be asked for explanations for If your manuscript goes from "review completed" to If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this). The The peer review status may initially transition from ‘Submitted’ to ‘Under Review’ once the manuscript is assigned to peer reviewers. When the new reviewer (s) accepts the invitation then Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. After revision and Dynamic Nature of Peer Review Status The peer review status may initially transition from ‘Submitted’ to ‘Under Review’ once the manuscript is assigned to peer reviewers. In some cases, a new reviewer may be invited. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. What does the status 'Reviewers Invited' mean after 14 days in the 'Under Review' status? After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Following this, it may shift to ‘Required Review It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. These reviewers then need sufficient time to This status change – back to ‘Under Review’ from ‘Reviewers Assigned’ – is not uncommon and usually means either of two things. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. So, the editor may have invited a new reviewer (s) (hence, the status is reviewer assigned). Generally speaking, “Reviewer Assigned” means that the You can always write to the journal to inquire about the status of the manuscript if you think it has been under “reviewers assigned” for a long time.
4kgocb
bflhao
eb6i9
g25dg
xesjo69u
pboitgl
h3a76zja
fthhza
5y43b
bhlrm